Napoleon in his imperial clothing, at his coronation in 1804. Who says that clothing and textiles do not matter?I have just attended part of a two-day conference at Naturalis (the massive, natural history museum) here in Leiden, on the theme of indifference. The conference is part of the Brave New World Art & Science series that has been running for nearly ten years.
Each year they concentrate on different themes, such as the ‘Future of Attention' (2023), in order so see how “the worlds of culture, philosophy, science, technology and storytelling will collide”.
As noted, this year’s theme was Indifference, and it covered both theoretic, philosophical, artistic, and actual themes, from empathy, medical issues, 3-D printing of cultural artifacts, to disability and handicap accessibility (or not).
Every man's dream of domestic bliss: Man smoking his pipe (while dozing), woman darning (his?) socks. Painting by Wybrand Hendriks (d.1831), Frans Halsmuseum, Haarlem.My talk of twenty minutes was about indifference to textiles, and concentrated on how textiles are an essential item to everyday life, yet often forgotten – in order to emphasise this point I asked the audience to remove their textiles, ie clothing, a request that got a mixed response! But I hope it brought home the simple fact that we all wear textiles and interact with textiles on a regular and daily basis. It's amazing to regard the number of people who ‘just’ wear clothing without thinking about the textiles what they have on and what it took to make those ‘simple’ pieces of cloth.
The themes in my talk ranged from Tutankhamun and textiles, Napoleon and his coronation textiles, the concept that textiles were ‘only’ a woman’s subject, and that many men are (or think they are) bored by the subject ( generations of farmers, spinners, dyers, weavers, printers and tailors, not to mention male embroiderers and knitters should give a collective sigh at this moment), and historic, international links on a commercial and trade level via textiles.